I foolishly let
myself get drawn into a FB 'conversation' over the continual efforts
of the Texas Republicans to institute a new voter ID card to combat
'voter fraud' in our state. The Justice Department has ruled against
it as posing undue hardship on the poor and minorities, infringing on
their constitutional right to vote but that doesn't stop our
state attorney general from filing a lawsuit against the government
over it, his 24th, incidentally, against the government
since he took office in 2004.
The reason the
republicans give for the new ID card is to prevent voter fraud. The
problem with that is that the percentage of proven voter fraud in our
state is so small as to be negligible, except perhaps in some local
elections where only a small percentage of the population votes in
the first place and the races are sometimes decided by a few votes,
as pointed out by a proponent of the law.
The effect
of the new voter ID card will be, in fact, to disenfranchise many
thousands of legal, law abiding voters.
This was my
comment :
I've
always had to show an ID to vote, we already do have to show an ID
to vote. that's not the problem. the problem is they want to
change it to a state issued picture ID. that means a lot of people
won't be able to vote that have been able to vote in the past. for
some people getting a state issued photo ID is not easy or even
possible. the new restriction will make it extremely difficult for
the poor and disenfranchised and students and elderly to vote. and
there is no reason for this new restriction since there has never
been any problem with voter fraud. hell half the people in this
country don't vote anyway. the only reason I can think of for the
republicans to push this new restriction is because they don't
feel like they can win in a fair setting so they are trying to
make it harder for people who traditionally don't vote republican
to vote at all. and that is not what America is about. voting is a
constitutional right. all those people who would be turned away at
the polls because they don't have the new 'proper' ID, all those
people who used to be able to vote, will still be held by the
results of any election, an election they were turned away from
participating in.
and
if you think getting this new free state issued voter ID from the
DPS is easy, try being poor with no driver's license so you have
to take the bus, you have several children at home that you will
have to take with you or find a bay sitter except you can't afford
one, you will have to take a day (or two if there is a big crowd
at the DPS) off work which you can't afford even if your boss will
give you the day off, and you have to have proper identification
like a birth certificate that you don't have a copy of.
|
To which he dug
up a few statistics stretching all the way back to 1948 to justify
the need. The number of fraudulent votes this new law might possibly
prevent is miniscule compared to the number of legal votes it will
prevent. And besides, it's not the poor, the minorities, the
students, or the old people who commit voter fraud. It's the cronies
and the funders that have a personal stake in the outcome who commit
voter fraud and those people will find a way, new ID card or not.
So I asked
him...
burning
down the house to get rid of a few roaches is an appropriate
response in your opinion?
|
Perhaps
he didn't like my analogy which I thought was quite apt. Taking an
extreme approach to a minor problem that ultimately doesn't really
address the problem but causes all kinds of damage anyway,
because
this was his reply...
The
courts will decide this one. We are living in two separate universes.
thanks for the debate. Adios.
Well, fella, the
Justice Department has already decided it but our state continues to
waste everyone's time and money to pursue it and I thank the powers
that be that we do live in different universes because yours must be
a pretty dismal place unless you are one of the chosen.




















































